Forest neighbourhoods and healthcare access for Adivasi communities in India: A critical interpretive synthesis
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: Environments where people live and work shape resources and opportunities available to them and studying healthcare access in relation to people’s living environments helps in understanding structural factors beyond individual factors. This is especially relevant for many Adivasi communities whose lives are closely connected with forests.
Methods: We used the critical interpretive synthesis method, a flexible, critical and iterative approach to literature synthesis. We conceptualised health and healthcare access in relation to neighbourhood environment and used this lens to examine healthcare access in Adivasi communities living in forest neighbourhoods in India.
Results: We developed a lens of neighbourhood as a physical and social environment and used it to build a conceptual framework describing forest neighbourhoods in India. We describe forest neighbourhoods in terms of their built and social environment. The availability of mobile networks, condition of roads, flooding of streams during rains and the forms of transport available constitute the built environment. There are two important components of the social environment, first is the connection of the Adivasi people with the forest and second is the institutional environment comprising of different actors working in the forest neighbourhood. The life of Adivasi people is connected with the forest through their livelihood, nutrition, physical and mental well-being and their ecological knowledge about the forest from their lived experience. The institutional environment consists of different actors that shape the built and social environment that comprise the government institutions, private for-profit providers, civil society organisations, traditional healers and the forest department.
Conclusion: While working on Adivasi health, it is critical to consider their connection with the forest. Exploring forest neighbourhoods as physical and social environments can help examine distribution of public services and how they are shaped by external policies and actors working in the neighbourhood. This could shift the focus of Adivasi health and healthcare interventions away from the current emphasis on individual-level health interventions.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors of content published in JCSH retain the copyright to their works.
References
Ministry of Health & Family Welfare & Ministry of Tribal Affairs. Tribal health in India – Bridging the gap and a roadmap for the future: Report of the expert committee on tribal health. New Delhi: MoHFW and MoTA, GoI; 2018.
Xaxa V. Tribes as Indigenous People of India. Econ Polit Wkly. 1999;34(51):3589–95.
Thresia CU, Srinivas PN, Mohindra KS, Jagadeesan CK. The Health of Indigenous Populations in South Asia: A Critical Review in a Critical Time. Int J Health Serv. :12.
Nakkeeran N, Sacks E, N Srinivas P, Juneja A, Gaitonde R, Garimella S, et al. Beyond behaviour as individual choice: A call to expand understandings around social science in health research. Wellcome Open Res. 2021 Aug 23;6:212.
World Health Organization. WHO Commission on the Social Determinants of Health, 2005-2008. Available from: http://www.who.int/social_determinants/thecommission/en/
Macintyre S, Ellaway A. Neighborhoods and Health: An Overview. In: Kawachi I, Berkman LF, editors. Neighborhoods and Health. 1st ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2003. p. 20–42. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/book/6120/chapter/149665599.
Obrist B, Iteba N, Lengeler C, Makemba A, Mshana C, Nathan R, et al. Access to health care in contexts of livelihood insecurity: A framework for analysis and action. PLoS Med. 2007;23;4(10):e308.
Ryvicker M. A conceptual framework for examining healthcare access and navigation: a behavioral-ecological perspective. Soc Theory Health. 2018;16(3):224–40.
Bernard P, Charafeddine R, Frohlich KL, Daniel M, Kestens Y, Potvin L. Health inequalities and place: A theoretical conception of neighbourhood. Soc Sci Med. 2007;65(9):1839–52.
Bell S, Wilson K, Bissonnette L, Shah T. Access to primary health care: Does neighborhood of residence matter? Ann Assoc Am Geogr. 2013;103(1):85–105.
Kirby JB, Kaneda T. Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage and access to health care. J Health Soc Behav. 2005;46(1):15–31.
Dixon-Woods M, Cavers D, Agarwal S, Annandale E, Arthur A, Harvey J, et al. Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6(1):35.
Tetui M, Zulu JM, Hurtig AK, Ekirapa-Kiracho E, Kiwanuka SN, Coe AB. Elements for harnessing participatory action research to strengthen health managers’ capacity: a critical interpretative synthesis. Health Res Policy Syst. 2018;16(1):33.
Coproducing health research with Indigenous peoples. Nature Medicine. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-023-02588-x.
Prashanth NS, Kochupurackal S, Juneja A, Seshadri T, Mahadeva C, Venkategowda M, et al. Reimagining innovation in health euity: Making a case for a community-embedded participatory learning site for Adivasi health research. J Community Health Syst Health. 2025;2(1):1–13.
Srinivas PN, Seshadri T, Velho N, Babu GR, Madegowda C, Channa Basappa Y, et al. Towards Health Equity and Transformative Action on tribal health (THETA) study to describe, explain and act on tribal health inequities in India: A health systems research study protocol. Wellcome Open Res. 2019;4:202.
Seshadri T, Madegowda C, R Babu G, N S P. Implementation research with the Soliga Indigenous community in southern India for local action on improving maternal health services. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network; 2019. Report No.: ID 3483650. Available from: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3483650.
Chitewere T, Shim JK, Barker JC, Yen IH. How neighborhoods influence health: Lessons to be learned from the application of political ecology. Health Place. 2017;45:117–23.
Kumar D, Singh T, Vaiyam P, Banjare P, Saini S. Identifying potential community barriers for accessing health care services context to health for all in rural-tribal geographical setting in India: A systematic review. J Community Health Manag. 2022;9(4):169–77.
Nallala S, Ghosh U, Desaraju SS, Kadam S, Kadarpeta RR, Van Belle S. Why are they “unreached”? Macro and meso determinants of health care access in hard to reach areas of Odisha, India. Int J Equity Health. 2023;22(1):2.
Jain Y, Kataria R, Patil S, Kadam S, Kataria A, Jain R, et al. Burden & pattern of illnesses among the tribal communities in central India : a report from a community health programme. Indian J Med Res. 2015 May;141(5):663–72.
Verma VR, Dash U. Geographical accessibility and spatial coverage modelling of public health care network in rural and remote India. PLoS One. 2020;15(10):e0239326.
Vila-Guilera J, Parikh P, Chaturvedi H, Ciric L, Lakhanpaul M. Towards transformative WASH: an integrated case study exploring environmental, sociocultural, economic and institutional risk factors contributing to infant enteric infections in rural tribal India. BMC Public Health. 2021;21:1–15.
Zorondo-rodríguez F, Gómez-baggethun E, Demps K, Ariza-montobbio P, García C, Reyes-García V. What defines quality of life? The gap between public policies and locally defined indicators among residents of Kodagu, Karnataka (India). Soc Indic Res. 2014;115(1):441–56.
Moosan H, Stanley A, Vijayakumar K, Jayasree A, Lawrence T, Veena A. Impediments to optimal health-care utilization of a particularly vulnerable tribal group in Wayanad: A qualitative study. Indian J Community Med. 2019;44(5):62–5.
Kujur J, S. IR, Mishra US. Land Vulnerability among Adivasis in India. Land Use Policy. 2020;99:105082.
Abel T, Frohlich KL. Capitals and capabilities: Linking structure and agency to reduce health inequalities. Soc Sci Med. 2012 Jan;74(2):236–44.
Sangha KK, Le Brocque A, Costanza R, Cadet-James Y. Ecosystems and indigenous well-being: An integrated framework. Glob Ecol Conserv. 2015;4:197–206.
Domínguez L, Luoma C. Decolonising conservation policy: How colonial land and conservation ideologies persist and perpetuate Indigenous injustices at the expense of the environment. Land. 2020;9(3):65.
Rai ND, Benjaminsen TA, Krishnan S, Madegowda C. Political ecology of tiger conservation in India: Adverse effects of banning customary practices in a protected area. Singap J Trop Geogr. 2019;40(1):124–39.
Boro B, Saikia N. A qualitative study of the barriers to utilizing healthcare services among the tribal population in Assam. PLoS One. 2020;15(10):e0240096.
Ministry of Tribal Affairs. Land and Governance under Fifth Schedule. Available from: https://tribal.nic.in/FRA/data/LandandGovernanceunderFifthSchedule.pdf.
Gram Sabha. Panchayat (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996. Available from: https://www.mha.gov.in/sites/default/files/PESAAct1996_0.pdf.
Dash T, Kothari A. Forest Rights in India. Available from: https://sacrednaturalsites.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Dash-Kothari-2013-Forest-Rights-in-India.pdf.
Hamal M, Buning T de C, De Brouwere V, Bardají A, Dieleman M. How does social accountability contribute to better maternal health outcomes? A qualitative study on perceived changes with government and civil society actors in Gujarat, India. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18.
United Nations. Agenda for Sustainable Development. Available from: https://sdgs.un.org/sites/default/files/publications/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdf.
Sangha KK, Madegowda C, Balasubramanian M. Reshaping conservation incorporating Indigenous perspectives. Glob Ecol Conserv. 2024;54:e03197.
Shah A, OG S. Dwindling forest resources and economic vulnerability among tribal communities in a dry/ sub-humid region in India. J Int Dev. 2009;21(3):419–32.