Barriers and opportunities to disseminate and translate evidence from implementation research and quality improvement in the context of resource limited settings
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The use of research evidence to influence policy decisions and practice is crucial for improving health service delivery and outcomes. Effective influence requires timely dissemination and translation of evidence to practitioners and policymakers at all decision-making levels. Traditional literature on research dissemination strategies has primarily focused on the Global North, often reflecting funding structures from that region. Yet there is a wealth of research, especially operational research as well as quality improvement (QI) initiatives that have been central to programs in the Global South where health resources are often limited.
This article examines the challenges and opportunities of turning research and quality improvement work into policy and practice in resource-limited settings. It draws on insights from the authors’ roles as panelists and moderators at the 3rd Annual Research and Quality Improvement Symposium, hosted by Partners In Health and the Ministry of Health of Sierra Leone on November 19, 2024.
Barriers to effective dissemination of scientific evidence include limited collaboration among partners, funding constraints, visa issues and travel restrictions. Additionally, inequities in research authorship, gender disparities and language barriers hinder evidence dissemination. Building strong collaborations between policymakers and researchers presents valuable opportunities to bridge these gaps. Innovative methods such as digital platforms can also enhance dissemination despite resource limitations. Further, decolonizing global health research and ensuring equitable access to resources are critical for effective evidence sharing. Advocating for local conferences and leveraging funding mechanisms from the Global South can further support researchers in these contexts.
To enhance healthcare quality in resource-limited settings, innovative strategies for sharing and implementing research and quality improvement initiatives are essential. Local researchers can utilize local knowledge, technology and partnerships to effectively disseminate findings that meet community needs. Strategic communication and collaboration among stakeholders are vital for translating research into policies that positively impact health outcomes.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors of content published in JCSH retain the copyright to their works.
References
Siriwardhana C. Promotion and reporting of research from resource-limited settings. Infect Dis Res Treat. 2015;8:1-4.
Paulus AB, Davey CH, Feldner KD. Research and quality improvement: how can they work together? Nephrol Nurs J. 2022;49(5):507-11.
Edwards A, Zweigenthal V, Olivier J. Evidence map of knowledge translation strategies, outcomes, facilitators and barriers in African health systems. Health Res Policy Syst. 2019;17(1):16.
Curtis K, Fry M, Shaban RZ, Considine J. Translating research findings to clinical nursing practice. J Clin Nurs. 2017;26(5-6):862-72.
Laplonge D, Albury K. Doing safer masculinities: addressing at-risk gendered behaviours on mine sites. MC J. 2013;16(2).
Oliver K, Innvær S, Lorenc T, Woodman J, Thomas J. A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:2.
Abu-Odah H, Said NB, Nair SC, Allsop MJ, Currow DC, Salah MS, et al. Identifying barriers and facilitators of translating research evidence into clinical practice: a systematic review of reviews. Health Soc Care Community. 2022;30(6):e3350-67.
Ummah MS. Advancing translation of clinical research into practice and population health impact through implementation science. Sustainability. 2019;11(1):1-14. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.06.005
Cooke CR. Translating evidence into practice: how good is good enough? J Eval Clin Pract. 2009;15(6):1121-3.
Balas EA, Boren SA. Managing clinical knowledge for health care improvement. In: Bemmel J, McCray AT, editors. Yearb Med Inform. 2000;9(01):65-70.
Derman RJ, Jaeger FJ. Overcoming challenges to dissemination and implementation of research findings in under-resourced countries. Reprod Health. 2018;15(Suppl 1):86.
Carbonell C, Adegbulugbe A, Cheung W, Ruff P. Barriers and challenges to implementing a quality improvement program: political and administrative challenges. JCO Glob Oncol. 2024;(10):1-7.
Ashcraft LE, Quinn DA, Brownson RC. Strategies for effective dissemination of research to United States policymakers: a systematic review. Implement Sci. 2020;15(1):85.
Baumann LC. Insights on conducting research in low-resource settings: examples from Vietnam and Uganda. Transl Behav Med. 2011;1(1):126-31.
Bodison SC, Sankaré I, Anaya H, Booker-Vaughns J, Miller A, Williams P, et al. Engaging the community in the dissemination, implementation, and improvement of health-related research. Clin Transl Sci. 2015;8(6):752-5.
Ongori DM, Kabo JW. Barriers and enablers to implementation of evidence-based practice in nursing: a systematic review of literature. Int J Sci Res Arch. 2024;13(1):1-10.
Tyler A, Glasgow RE. Implementing improvements: opportunities to integrate quality improvement and implementation science. Hosp Pediatr. 2021;11(9):969-72.
Bakker W, van den Akker T, Stekelenburg J. Self-reflection as a starting point: observations in global health research. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2024;12(6):1-4.
Innvær S, Vist G, Trommald M, Oxman A. Health policy-makers’ perceptions of their use of evidence: a systematic review. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2002;7(4):239-44.
Ross-Hellauer T, Tennant JP, Banelytė V, Gorogh E, Luzi D, Kraker P, et al. Ten simple rules for innovative dissemination of research. PLoS Comput Biol. 2020;16(4):e1007704.
Bandara MPS, Pai M. Shifting power in global health will require leadership by the Global South and allyship by the Global North. Lancet. 2024;404(10464):1711-3.
Pai M, Abimbola S. Science should save all, not just some. Science. 2024;385(6709):123-4.
Smith A. Restrictive visa policies harm global scientific exchanges. Lancet. 2024;403(10445):2001.
Velin L, Lartigue JW, Johnson SA, Zorigtbaatar A, Kanmounye US, Truche P, et al. Con-ference equity in global health: a systematic review of factors impacting LMIC represen-tation at global health conferences. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6(1):e003456.
Latin American Global Observatory (LAGO). Short term visa accessibility: Schengen vi-sa rejection rate [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2025 May 3]. Available from: https://www.lagocollective.org/material/f/visas/rejected-by-gdp/#year-2023
Nature Africa. How visa rejections are stalling Africa’s health research [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2025 May 3]. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/d44148-024-00349-7
Kark R, Berson Y, Charles B. Wo∼Men and leadership: re-thinking the state of research on gender and leadership through waves of feminist thinking. J Leadersh Organ Stud. 2024;31(2):150-65.
Das JK, Raza M, Padhani ZA, et al. Addressing inequities in research for early to mid-career women scientists in low- and middle-income countries: the “Supporting Women in Science” programme. Front Glob Womens Health. 2024;5:1-9.
Squires A, Sadarangani T, Jones S. Strategies for overcoming language barriers in re-search. J Adv Nurs. 2020;76(2):499-508.