Ready to co-create? Considering pre-creation in care service development for older adults in the rural Swedish north

Main Article Content

Frida Jonsson
Dean B Carson
Patrik Nilsson
Alexander Jonsson
Ashlyn Sahay
Anna-Karin Hurtig

Abstract

Introduction: While co-creation has emerged as a promising approach to address complex problems in health and care systems, few examples exist where scholars have examined what separate stakeholder groups do to enhance their potential to engage in collaborative processes of joint problem-solving. The current study seeks to bridge this knowledge gap by providing empirical insights into the challenges of one stakeholder enacting ‘pre-creation’ to reform care services for older adults in the rural Swedish north through the Storuman Cares 2050 initiative.


Methods: This case study draws upon data collected through extensive notetaking of 23 core group meetings within Storuman Cares 2050. The notes were summarized into a database, which also included reflections on how previous experiences with other projects should inform progress as well as deliberations on engagement with co-creation partners. The data was thematically analyzed with themes developed through an inductive approach.


Results: Three themes were developed. The first one, ‘getting our house in order’, makes explicit the values, principles, and approaches that a stakeholder might bring to a co-creation process. The second theme, ‘starting close to home’, describes the value of supporting and stimulating internal engagements through demonstrating a commitment and capacity for change. The third theme, ‘reaching out’, details the importance of, but challenges to, engaging with external stakeholders.


Conclusion: This case study bridges an important knowledge gap by detailing how one stakeholder navigated past experiences and the history of relationships with diverse stakeholders while trying to support internal engagements and other local voices when aspiring to co-create. By introducing the concept of ‘pre-creation’ as encompassing the enhancement of an organization’s potential to engage in complex processes of joint problem-solving, the findings provide a stimulus for scholars to further explore what separate stakeholder groups do to enable them to co-create.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Jonsson F, Carson DB, Nilsson P, Jonsson A, Sahay A, Hurtig A-K. Ready to co-create? Considering pre-creation in care service development for older adults in the rural Swedish north. J Community Syst Health [Internet]. 2024 Oct. 1 [cited 2024 Oct. 3];1(1). Available from: https://journals.ub.umu.se/index.php/jcsh/article/view/1043
Section
Original research

References

WHO. Scaling up action against noncommunicable diseases: how much will it cost? Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.

Bucknall TK, Hutchinson AM. Cultivating value co-creation in health system research. Comment on "Experience of health leadership in partnering with university-based researchers in Canada - A call to re-imagine research". Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021;10(3):165-7.

Torfing J, Sørensen E, Røiseland A. Transforming the public sector into an arena for co-creation: Barriers, drivers, benefits, and ways forward. Adm Soc. 2019;51(5):795-825.

Voorberg WH, Bekkers VJJM, Tummers LG. A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: Embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Manag Rev. 2015;17(9):1333-57.

Ramaswamy V, Ozcan K. The co-creation paradigm: Stanford University Press; 2014.

Oertzen A-S, Odekerken-Schröder G, Brax SA, Mager B. Co-creating services—conceptual clarification, forms and outcomes. J Serv Manage. 2018;29(4):641-79.

Bentzen TØ. Continuous co-creation: how ongoing involvement impacts outcomes of co-creation. Public Manag Rev. 2022;24(1):34-54.

Singh G, Owens J, Cribb A. What are the professional, political, and ethical challenges of co-creating health care systems? AMA J Ethics. 2017;19(11):1132-8.

Bentzen TØ. Co-creation: A new pathway for solving dysfunctionalities in governance systems? Adm Soc. 2021;54(6):1148-77.

Keast R, Mandell M. The collaborative push: moving beyond rhetoric and gaining evidence. J Manag Gov. 2014;18(1):9-28.

Ansell C, Torfing J. Co-creation: the new kid on the block in public governance. Policy Polit. 2021;49(2):211-30.

Leask CF, Sandlund M, Skelton DA, Altenburg TM, Cardon G, Chinapaw MJM, et al. Framework, principles and recommendations for utilising participatory methodologies in the co-creation and evaluation of public health interventions. Res Involv Engagem. 2019;5(1):2.

Lazo-Porras M, Perez-Leon S, Cardenas MK, Pesantes MA, Miranda JJ, Suggs LS, et al. Lessons learned about co-creation: developing a complex intervention in rural Peru. Glob Health Action. 2020;13(1):1754016.

Vargas C, Whelan J, Brimblecombe J, Allender S. Co-creation, co-design, co-production for public health – a perspective on definitions and distinctions. PHRP. 2022.

Pearce T, Maple M, McKay K, Shakeshaft A, Wayland S. Co-creation of new knowledge: Good fortune or good management? Res Involv Engage. 2022;8(1):65.

Janamian T, Crossland L, Jackson CL. Embracing value co-creation in primary care services research: a framework for success. Med J Australia. 2016;204(S7):S5-S11.

Von Heimburg D, Ness O. Relational welfare: a socially just response to co-creating health and wellbeing for all. Scand J Public Health. 2021;49(6):639-52.

Greenhalgh T, Jackson C, Shaw S, Janamian T. Achieving research impact through co-creation in community-based health services: Literature review and case study. Milbank Q. 2016;94(2):392-429.

Szebehely M, Trydegård G-B. Home care for older people in Sweden: a universal model in transition. Health Soc Care Community. 2012;20(3):300-9.

Davey A, Malmberg B, Sundström G. Aging in Sweden: Local variation, local control. Gerontologist. 2014;54(4):525-32.

Hansson A, Svensson A, Ahlström BH, Larsson LG, Forsman B, Alsén P. Flawed communications: Health professionals’ experience of collaboration in the care of frail elderly patients. Scand J Public Health. 2018;46(7):680-9.

Vaughan G, Carson DB, Preston R, Mude W, Holt A-M. A “toolkit” for rural aged care? Global insights from a scoping review. Front Polit Sci. 2022;4.

Braun V, Clarke V. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qual Res Sport Exerc Health. 2019;11(4):589-97.

SC2050. Storuman Cares 2050: An options paper for elder car. Storuman: Storuman municipality; 2022.

SC2050. Storuman Cares 2050: Gemenskapsboende – ett nytt slags bostäder för äldre. Storuman: Storuman municipality; 2022.