Community members’ perspective on social accountability in the health system: a cross- sectional study from Tanzania

Main Article Content

Ebba Hemgren Sigås
Hussein Kapuya
Stephen Maluka
Anna-Karin Hurtig
Miguel San Sebastián

Abstract

Introduction: Social accountability initiatives are considered a way to address inefficiencies and improve overall health system performance. Tanzania has introduced Health Facility Governing Committees (HFGCs) to improve social accountability of the health system. However, information on how communities perceive these committees is lacking.  This study aimed to assess the prevalence and social determinants of the HFGCs accountability from the community perspective in Tanzania.


Methods: The research employed a cross-sectional survey design in two Tanzanian districts (Handeni and Mbarali) selected for their contrasting health performance. Data collection took place from July to October 2022, involving 1184 households in 31 villages/mitaa. The study measured social accountability through a set of six questions, focusing on community support, sensitization, feedback, trust, engagement, and overall accountability of HFGCs. Socio-demographic data such as sex, age, education, occupation, type of health facility and district were also collected and analyzed using linear regression to identify factors influencing perceptions of accountability.


Results: The findings revealed a low prevalence of social accountability as measured by the variables of community awareness and engagement with the HFGCs. Only a small percentage of respondents felt adequately informed or involved in the activities of these committees. Social determinants such as higher education levels and certain occupations, such as business and retirement and those living in Handeni district, correlated positively with a better perception of social accountability.


Conclusion: The study highlights significant challenges in the operational effectiveness of HFGCs in Tanzania, with a notable disconnect between these bodies and the communities they serve. Despite the theoretical framework for social accountability, actual community engagement remains low, impacting the overall efficacy of health governance at the local level. Future research should focus on improving community awareness and participation in these committees to improve their functionality and accountability, thereby aligning with national health objectives and local needs.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Hemgren Sigås E, Kapuya H, Maluka S, Hurtig A-K, San Sebastián M. Community members’ perspective on social accountability in the health system: a cross- sectional study from Tanzania. J Community Syst Health [Internet]. 2024 Oct. 21 [cited 2024 Nov. 13];1(1). Available from: https://journals.ub.umu.se/index.php/jcsh/article/view/1071
Section
Original research
Author Biography

Miguel San Sebastián, Umeå University

I am a medical doctor with a MSc degree in control of infectious diseases and a Ph.D. degree in environmental epidemiology from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. I practiced public health during 12 years among Indigenous communities of the Amazon basin of Ecuador. Currently working as Professor in Public Health at the Department of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå university, teaching different courses (public health, epidemiology, social epidemiology) at Master and PhD level. My current research is focused on strengthening health systems in low-income countries and social inequalities in health in the Swedish context. I am also part of the Norrland´s Observatory for Equity in Health and Health Care (NOEHHC) and Lávvuo: Research and Education for Sámi Health.

References

Naher N, Balabanova D, Hutchinson E, Marten R, Hoque R, Tune SNBK, et al. Do social accountability approaches work? A review of the literature from selected low- and middle-income countries in the WHO South-East Asia region. Health Policy Plan. 2020 Nov 9;35(Suppl 1):i76–96.

Danhoundo G, Nasiri K, Wiktorowicz ME. Improving social accountability processes in the health sector in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2018 Apr 13;18:497.

Molyneux S, Atela M, Angwenyi V, Goodman C. Community accountability at peripheral health facilities: a review of the empirical literature and development of a conceptual framework. Health Policy Plan. 2012 Oct;27(7):541–54.

Dwicaksono A, Fox AM. Does decentralization improve health system performance and outcomes in low‐ and middle‐income countries? A systematic review of evidence from quantitative studies. Milbank Q. 2018 Jun;96(2):323–68.

World Health Organization, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. Delivering quality health services: a global imperative for universal health coverage [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018 [cited 2023 Nov 10]. 93 p. Available from: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/272465

Kesale AM, Mahonge C, Muhanga M. The quest for accountability of Health Facility Governing Committees implementing Direct Health Facility Financing in Tanzania: A supply-side experience. Mordaunt DA, editor. PLoS One. 2022 Apr 28;17(4):e0267708.

Boydell V, McMullen H, Cordero J, Steyn P, Kiare J. Studying social accountability in the context of health system strengthening: innovations and considerations for future work. Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Mar 29;17(1):34.

Joshi A. Legal Empowerment and Social Accountability: Complementary Strategies Toward Rights-based Development in Health? World Dev. 2017 Nov;99:160–72.

Sirili N, Kiwara A, Gasto F, Goicolea I, Hurtig AK. Training and deployment of medical doctors in Tanzania post-1990s health sector reforms: assessing the achievements. Hum Resour Health. 2017 Dec;15(1):27.

Maluka SO, Bukagile G. Community participation in the decentralised district health systems in Tanzania: why do some health committees perform better than others? Int J Health Plann Manage. 2016 Apr;31(2):E86–104.

George AS, Mehra V, Scott K, Sriram V. Community participation in health systems research: A systematic review assessing the state of research, the nature of interventions involved and the features of engagement with communities. PLoS One. 2015 Oct 23;10(10):e0141091.

Kesale A, Mahonge C, Muhanga M. The Functionality of Health Facility Governing Committees and Their Associated Factors in Selected Primary Health Facilities Implementing Direct Health Facility Financing in Tanzania [Internet]. In Review; 2022 Jan [cited 2023 Oct 18]. Available from: https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-1092885/v1

Maluka SO. Strengthening fairness, transparency and accountability in health care priority setting at district level in Tanzania. Glob Health Action. 2011;4.

Kinyenje ES, Yahya TA, Hokororo JC, Eliakimu ES, Mohamed MA, Degeh MM, et al. Social accountability in primary health care facilities in Tanzania: Results from Star Rating Assessment. Augusto O, editor. PLoS One. 2022 Jul 25;17(7):e0268405.

Kesale AM, Mahonge C, Muhanga M. Effects of decentralization on the functionality of health facility governing committees in lower and middle-income countries: a systematic literature review. Glob Health Action. 15(1):2074662.

Kraft JM, Paina L, Boydell V, Elnakib S, Sihotang A, Bailey A, et al. Social Accountability Reporting for Research (SAR4Research): checklist to strengthen reporting on studies on social accountability in the literature. Int J Equity Health. 2022 Aug 30;21(1):121.

Marston C, McGowan CR, Boydell V, Steyn P. Methods to measure effects of social accountability interventions in reproductive, maternal, newborn, child, and adolescent health programs: systematic review and critique. J Health Popul Nutr. 2020 Dec 7;39(1):13.

Maluka S, Kamuzora P, San Sebastiån M, Byskov J, Olsen ØE, Shayo E, et al. Decentralized health care priority-setting in Tanzania: evaluating against the accountability for reasonableness framework. Soc Sci Med. 2010 Aug;71(4):751–9.

Mukasa O, Masanja H, DeSavigny D, Schellenberg J. A cohort study of survival following discharge from hospital in rural Tanzanian children using linked data of admissions with community-based demographic surveillance. Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2021 Dec;18(1):4.

Tanzania National Bureau of Statistics and President’s Office - Finance and Planning, Presidents’ Office - Finance and Planning Office of the Chief Government Statistician Zanzibar. The 2022 Population and Housing Census: Administrative Units Population Distribution Report. 2022 [cited 2023 Oct 5]. Administrative_units_Population_Distribution_Report_Tanzania_volume1a.pdf. Available from: https://www.nbs.go.tz/nbs/takwimu/Census2022/Administrative_units_Population_Distribution_Report_Tanzania_volume1a.pdf

Department of Development Studies, College of Social Sciences and Humanities, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Ringo JJ, Bengesi KMK, Department of Policy Planning and Management, College of Social Sciences and Humanities, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Mbago MCY, Department of Statistics, University of Dar es Salaam. Access and Challenges of Health Facilities amongst Agro-pastoralist Communities in Handeni District, Tanzania. J Popul Soc Stud. 2017 Dec 27;26(1):53–67.

Kesale A, Mahonge C, Muhanga M. The determinants of the performance of health facility governing committees (HFGC) in selected primary health facilities in Tanzania. Tanzania J Community Develop. 2021 Nov 18;1:53–66.

Oyeyemi AI, Gberevbie DE, Ibietan J. Citizens participation and primary healthcare policy implementation in Ogun State, Nigeria: An empirical and systems enquiry. Humanit Soc Sci Lett. 2021;9(1):50–7.

Ageing and health [Internet]. [cited 2023 Dec 6]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-and-health